Search

distracted driving - search results

If you're not happy with the results, please do another search

Kevin Gershowitz (standing behind podium), President, Gershow Recycling, speaks during a press conference announcing the Town of Huntington’s anti-drunk and distracted driving campaign on November 30.

Gershow Recycling recently donated the use of a wrecked car in support of the Town of Huntington’s Anti-Drunk and Distracted Driving Campaign. Presented by Mark Cuthbertson, Councilman, Town of Huntington, and the Huntington Town Board, the program reminds residents of the dangers of drunk or distracted driving during the holidays.

Kevin Gershowitz, President, Gershow Recycling, took part in a press conference that was held on November 30, along with Councilman Mark Cuthbertson; Cathy Busuttil, whose sister was the victim of a drunk driving accident; Councilwoman Joan Cergol; Isai Fuentes, Program Specialist, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, New York State Office; and law enforcement personnel.

Mr. Gershowitz thanked the Town and MADD for their public awareness efforts and noted that Gershow takes in thousands of vehicles that were involved in serious accidents each year, some of which were the result of drunk driving. “There’s no reason to drive drunk today,” Mr. Gershowitz said. “Technology has afforded us the ability to use Uber, Lyft and all the types of ride-sharing services. I urge you: take advantage of it. Have fun, but stay away from your car if you’ve had too much to drink.”

Gershow has nine locations in Brooklyn, New Hyde Park, Valley Stream, Freeport, Lindenhurst, Huntington Station, Bay Shore, Medford and Riverhead. For more information, call (631) 289-6188 or visit www.gershow.com.

by -
0 440
A screen shot from the May 28 Zoom presentation. Photo from Stony Brook Medicine

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic overshadowing other public health issues, Stony Brook Medicine Trauma Center workers have not forgotten the issues that occur on the road due to distracted driving.

A visual used in the distracted driving program. Photo from Stony Brook Medicine

According to Stony Brook Medicine, reckless and distracted driving is the number one killer of American teenagers. To reduce car crashes and injuries the trauma center has trained more than 2,500 students in safe driving in the Commack, Central Islip and Middle Country school districts since 2016. This year, with no in-school teaching, the pandemic created a challenge in keeping the message going..

To reach teenagers this year, the trauma center decided to make the annual presentation virtual. On May 28 in three sessions, Commack High School students took part in the nationally recognized teen safe driving program Impact Teen Drivers. The trauma center is the first in New York to offer the program, according to Injury Prevention & Outreach coordinator for Stony Brook Medicine Trauma Center, Kristi Ladowski, who is a liaison for Impact Teen Drivers.

Heather Leggio, Commack High School psychologist and Students Against Drunk Driving club adviser, said remote learning had been taking place for two months, which helped with the new virtual presentation, since a process was already in place. The psychologist said she felt the virtual version enabled more to participate and there was a constant stream of discussion.

Ladowski said when she started looking into different programs a few years ago she kept going back to the California-based Impact Teen Drivers program. She said among its strengths are the supportive staff members, research- and evidence-based material and that the program doesn’t incorporate the usual scare tactics that other programs have used.

She said using statistics and real stories the program connects with teenagers on a visceral level. She added that, from the beginning, Commack was on board with the program, and the trauma center partnered with the high school’s SADD group.

“Commack School District with the SADD students and their health classes just really connected with the program and has run it year after year with such success so it’s been such a great partnership,” Ladowski said.

In the past, Ladowski presented the program in schools in a small classroom setting to connect better with students, and in Commack, SADD members were trained and then the club members took the lead and ran the program in their 10th-grade classes.

“We’re happy to go to the school, and I will run the program as the instructor, but to really embed it in a school is what we’re looking for, and to see the passion that these young students have to take on the program and make it their own and really connect with their peers to make a difference — that’s what’s really great about working with the Commack School District,” she said.

Sara Decker, Commack High School social worker, said everyone is motivated and passionate about the program, and health teachers have also been advocates for halting distracted driving..

“As the program went on for different years, we were able to recruit more SADD members through this presentation in our classes and it really gave our club a rejuvenation,” she said. “Commack students really got behind this important topic from the beginning.”

Decker said Ladowski gave this year’s virtual presentation over Zoom and afterward the students were able to chat and ask questions. SADD students and teachers helped to moderate the chat.

Ladowski said during the course she goes over risky behaviors such as the application of lipstick or eating and drinking that can be lethal while driving a car.

A visual used in the distracted driving program. Photo from Stony Brook Medicine

“It constantly brings it back to our choices and then it also brings in relating everyday activities, things like lipstick application, doing our hair, eating and drinking, using our cellphones,” Ladowski said. “These everyday things that we do by themselves that are not dangerous, but as soon as we make the choice to do it in a car, it can become dangerous and deadly. We don’t get a second chance, so it’s so important to make good decisions every time we’re in the car.”

Ladowski added that passengers should do their part not to distract drivers and also speak up when they don’t feel safe.

Leggio said the students quickly understand that anything that they do that’s not 100 percent focused on driving is considered a distraction. She said they suggest for students to have a plan every time they go in a car as far as how many passengers they feel comfortable having in the car and a rule for everyone to wear seatbelts.

The program, Leggio said, empowers the students and agrees that it’s helpful that it doesn’t rely on scare tactics. She added that when the SADD students give the presentation, the younger ones look up to them.

“The kids don’t get turned off by it immediately,” she said. “They recognize it as a logical, rational explanation. It just makes sense.”

Decker and Leggio said in the past they noticed many students realized mistakes their parents have made while driving.

“A lot of them recognize what their parents are doing is not okay, and it kind of empowers them to go home and kind of remind mom and dad they shouldn’t be texting and driving or taking a call,” Leggio said.

Ladwoski said the family discussion is important because sometimes more experienced drivers don’t perceive the risks as such.

“It’s such a rational process to have that aha moment,” she said, adding that parents may rethink certain behaviors like taking calls while driving to set a better example.

While the other districts weren’t able to use the virtual version of the program this year, Ladowski is hoping to offer it to libraries so more teenagers can take advantage of it during the summer vacation.

by -
0 60
File photo

Suffolk County Police, in conjunction with state and local police on Long Island, conducted a month-long focused enforcement effort specifically targeting distracted driving between April 1 and April 30.

During the focused enforcement effort, Suffolk County police officers issued more than 930 citations for distracted driving violations, yielding a 117 percent increase compared to the same time period in 2015.

Suffolk County police officers responded to 3,320 crashes in April 2016, an 11.75 percent decrease for the same time period of 2015.

New York State Police Troop L issued 810 citations during the initiative, including 470 cell phone tickets, 314 texting tickets and 26 Move Over Law tickets.

The initiative specifically targeted motorists who were driving while distracted by texting or talking on mobile devices due to the strong correlation between these violations and motor vehicle crashes. Drivers who did not abide by New York’s Move Over Law were also cited.

This law protects law enforcement officers, emergency workers, tow and service vehicle operators and other maintenance workers stopped along roadways while performing their duties.

The initiative, which was funded by the governor’s Traffic Safety Committee, was carried out across the state.

The additional police resources were funded through a $450,000 grant allocated to state police specifically for year-round distracted driving enforcement.

Photo from Albany Drugged Driving Rally

Suffolk County District Attorney Raymond A. Tierney continued his two-day rally in Albany today calling on lawmakers, with the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York (DAASNY), to pass a bill that would close the loopholes in the drugged driving law that make it unworkable. Current law does not allow an individual to be arrested and prosecuted for operating a vehicle while obviously impaired by any substance that is not listed in Section 3306 of the Public Health Law. Senate Bill S.3135 and Assembly Bill A.174, also known as the “Deadly Driving Bill,” closes the loopholes.

“There is noone on our roads, driver, motorcyclist,bicyclistor pedestrian, whois immune from becoming a victim of a drugged driving crash. Closing this loophole is important because we must doeverything we can to stop the horrendous loss of lives on our roadways. Impaired is impaired. Dangerous is dangerous, no matter whether it is alcohol or drugs,” said District Attorney Tierney. The type of alcohol ingested by the driver does not matter for an alcohol DWI and the same should be true for drugs and other substances. We have to use common sense to keep New York families safe.”

“The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York has consistently advocated for legislation to close loopholes in New York State’s drugged driving laws that preventthe prosecution of all impaired drivers to the fullest extent of the law. The passage of the Deadly Driving Bill (S.3135/A.174) would eliminate the often-impossible requirement of specifically identifying the drug that is impairing a drugged driver,” said District Attorneys Association of the State of New York President, Erie County District Attorney John J. Flynn. “We are committed to making sure New York State’s roadways are safe and that impaired drivers are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but to do so requires necessary modifications to our current laws. The legislation will also aid in the prosecution of these offenders by expanding the probable cause for evidential blood draws and protect the safety of our roadways by automatically suspending driver’s licenses for individuals charged with impaired driving.”

“Public safety isn’t just about responding when tragedy strikes; it’s also about prevention. Albany County has seen far too many fatal traffic crashes in recent years that were completely avoidable,” said Albany County District Attorney David Soares. “The Deadly Driving Bill would allow this office to engage in prevention by streamlining the process for prosecuting drugged driving cases. As amateur chemists escalate their efforts to poison our community, we in law enforcement must also escalate our efforts to stop them, which requires leaders to provide us with the laws and tools to do our jobs.”

“Drugged driving is not a mistake. It’s a selfish and dangerous act. It doesn’t matter whether the drugs are on a list or not. It only matters that they make the driver dangerous. The party may end but the consequences of drugged driving can last a lifetime,” said Onondaga District Attorney Bill Fitzpatrick. “Please join me in supporting this life saving piece of legislation sponsored by Assembly Transportation Chair Bill Magnarelli and Senator John Mannion.”

“The Deadly Driving Bill is common sense legislation, and I am proud to support such a proposal that values public safety,” said Monroe County District Attorney Sandra Doorley. “Illegal drugs and narcotics are always evolving, and this legislation ensures that law enforcement and the courts can stay on top of all impairing substances without awaiting time-consuming updates to the New York Public Health Law. Those who drive impaired choose to consume mind-altering substances before driving their vehicle, putting countless lives at risk. We must be able to hold these deadly drivers accountable, and when appropriate, help connect them with services if they are struggling with substance abuse disorder of any kind.”

“Drunk, drugged, and distracted driving are at epidemic levels today. As cops and prosecutors, we need all the tools we can get to make successful prosecutions against dangerous drivers,” said Nassau County District Attorney Anne Donnelly. “Under New York State law, arresting someone for driving under the influence of drugs is difficult. I thank District Attorney Tierney and his team for crafting a bill that will fix this loophole once and for all. We ask our legislators in Albany to pass this bill. It will save lives and will make our roadways safer for pedestrians, bikers and motorists.”

“New York State’s recreational marijuana program and the explosion of illegal cannabis sales in our convenience stores and smoke shops has made one thing crystal clear: our roads have more drivers impaired by the use of drugs than ever before,” said Staten Island District Attorney Michael McMahon. “Yet our laws are woefully inadequate in addressing the danger that these drivers pose to fellow motorists, passengers, and pedestrians. I am proud to lend full support to this legislation which would expand law enforcement’s ability to hold impaired and intoxicated drivers responsible for endangering themselves, their passengers, and all around them after they made the terrible, irresponsible, and dangerous decision to get behind the wheel after using substances. We also need more Drug Recognition Experts to carry out field sobriety examinations. Road safety must be a priority in Albany this session, and we look forward to working with the Sponsors to pass this legislation and to fight for funding for more DRE training across the state.”

“New York’s outdated approach to impaired driving handcuffs law enforcement, puts innocent people at risk and leaves those who might be struggling with a drug problem unchecked and untreated,” said Family and Children’s Association, President/Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Jeffrey Reynolds. “If we’ve learned anything during the current opioid crisis, its that public safety is enhanced when law enforcement and addiction treatment providers work together. Arrests often precipitate treatment entry, potentially putting those struggling with addiction on the road to recovery and leaving our communities safer and healthier. Drugs have evolved rapidly in recent years and New York’s laws should absolutely follow suit.”

“Responsibility.org and the National Alliance to Stop Impaired Driving (NASID) support the critical efforts to reform New York’s drugged driving laws, especially broadening the scope of drugged driving to include all impairing substances rather than those just on the predefined New York Public Health 3306 list,” said National Alliance to Stop Impaired Driving (NASID) Director & Responsibility.org Senior Vice President of Traffic Safety Darrin Grondel. “This legislation eliminates a dangerous loophole where some impaired drivers can’t be arrested or held accountable. Statistics show that fatal and serious injury crashes involving drugged and/or drunk drivers have increased significantly in New York, and these statistics are glaring red flags that something is not working, and action is needed to improve existing law regarding impaired and drugged driving.”

“Cannabis, opioids, even some over the counter medications can negatively impact the way people drive, which affects the safety of all road users,” said National Safety Council Vice President of Government Affairs Jane Terry. “Impairment, regardless of the type of substance, causes a decline in visual function, mental judgment and motor skills. The National Safety Council fully supports this bill to help make roads safer and save lives in the state of New York.”

“As the backbone of New York’s efforts to reduce the incidence of impaired driving, STOP-DWI’s 58 local coordinators have had a front-row seat to the lack of accountability for drivers who are impaired by substances not included on the Public Health Law list. As New York State works to reduce impaired crashes, we must ensure justice for victims of these crashes isn’t hindered by public policy barriers,” said NYS STOP-DWI Coordinators’ Association Chair Lindsay Tomidy. “While STOP-DWI has advocated for legislative reform for over a decade, we’ve observed an alarming rise in fatalities caused by impaired drivers statewide. For every one of these fatalities, our coordinators are working first hand with more innocent victims who are not given reasonable answers on the lack of justice for their loved ones who were taken by an irresponsible choice made. This coalition represents a collective voice for New York to join the rest of the nation in holding impaired drivers liable for their deadly decisions to ingest impairing substances and share the roads with millions of innocent and defenseless New Yorkers.”

“Drugged driving is a growing and complex problem. We are a movement of caring individuals with a shared purpose to end the devastation of drunk and drugged driving, which is both a violent crime and a health and safety issue that affects every community,” said MADD Regional Executive Director NY|NJ|PA Paige Carbone. “New York’s laws do not work well to stop drugged drivers before they crash leaving deadly drivers free to endanger everyone. MADD supports the Deadly Driving Bill, and our vision is to create a nation without drunk and drugged driving.”

“Far too many people are being seriously injured or killed by drivers impaired by drugs. Indeed, according to recent state data from 2022, 37% of fatal crashes in New York State are drug related,” said AAA New York State Legislative Committee Chairman,John Corlett. “AAA strongly encourages legislators to pass legislation closing the glaring loopholes in the state’s drug impaired driving laws during this legislative session. AAA also commends both Suffolk County District Attorney Raymond Tierney and Nassau County District Attorney for their leadership on this issue.”

“Under the current law, defense lawyers exploit a loophole in the criminal system from which they benefit financially and leaves their clients unaccountable for their actions,” said Remove Intoxicated Drivers President William Aiken. “The drugged driving bill S.3135/A.174 is needed to include all drugs that can impair one’s ability to driver. The passage of this bill will result in safer roads for everyone.”

“To be blunt, impaired is impaired and dead is dead. Under the current law, ‘the list,’ and all the other procedural impediments, make it far too difficult for law enforcement to protect New Yorkers from drugged drivers,” said DEDICATEDD President Marge Lee. “If the drug is not on the list or cannot be named, the law actually makes protection impossible. When we, the victims, identify our dead there is no list. We have no options. We personally know the definition of dead. We need the expanded definition of drugs and the legal definition of impaired. DEDICATEDD is begging our legislators to pass the Deadly Driving Bill.”

“Pass this legislation and stop tying the hands of law enforcement by requiring them to identify the specific drug used by perpetrators before an arrest can be made,” said NY Coalition for Transportation Safety Director Cynthia Brown. “Close the loophole that allows drugged drivers to walk free and continue to be a threat to all other roadway users.”

“The landscape of drugs and drugged driving is a kaleidoscope of factors that is ever changing. Currently, there are an overwhelming number of drugs including over the counter, prescription drugs, and illicit drugs that may cause impairment and a public safety risk when taken while driving,” said Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP) CEO Tara Casanova Powell. “For this reason, several states have revised their language to ‘under the influence of alcohol or any drug or any combination thereof.’ Furthermore, only four States remaining that restrict drug-impaired driving statutes to a limited set of drugs: Alaska, Hawaii, Florida, and Massachusetts. As the Secretariat and responsible party on record with the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) as the Accredited Standards Developer (ASD) for the Manual on Classification of Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents and advocate for research-based, data driven legislation to support public safety, ATSIP strongly supports the Deadly Driving Bill (S.3135/A.174).”

District Attorney Tierney collaborated with Senate Sponsor, John Mannion and Assembly Transportation Committee Chair, Bill Magnarelli to close the loopholes and add the best, scientifically supported tools available to make New York’s drugged driving law a model for the rest of the country.

District Attorney Tierney was joined by impaired driving victims’ families, community members, district attorneys, lawmakers, traffic safety advocates, criminal justice professionals, and members of the Coalition to Protect New Yorkers from Drugged Driving to promote the passage of the bill.

Drugged drivers threaten the lives of random and innocent roadway users of every age, gender, ethnicity, and economic status every day throughout New York State. Data collection is notoriously problematic in this area, but the trend is significant. All roadway fatalities in New York have increased, including impaired driving fatalities. But the rate of increase in drug-involved fatalities has outpaced drinking driver fatalities in the last five years. Drug-involved fatalities have increased 33% from 200 in 2018 to 266 in 2022. The raw number is also higher than alcohol and represents 23% of the total number of roadway fatalities in the state.

It is a public safety and public health issue. Under the current law, an obviously impaired driver cannot be arrested and prosecuted without naming the drug ingested as one on the Public Health Law 3306 list even though drivers also use many substances that are not on the list to get high. Those substances range from inhaling things like “Dust-Off” computer cleaner, to Xylazine (also known as “tranq”) to newly created synthetic drugs to drugs that finally made it to the list and were then altered by brilliant, but unscrupulous, chemists like fentanyl analogs.

The loophole also means that a driver using a drug on the Public Health Law list can avoid prosecution by refusing an identifying test, not disclosing what they are using, avoid responsibility, not get the substance abuse treatment that is already in the law and sidestep drugged driving license repercussions. There is no intervention to help the driver avoid a repetition of the dangerous driving event and no deterrence to protect the public.

According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), New York was one of only 5 states that use a list for drugged driving as of 2022. In January of 2023 NTSB sent letters to the Governors of these states, including New York, with Safety Recommendation H-22-044 supporting impaired driving charges for all drugs that impair driving (without reference to a list). On January 1, 2024, Oregon officially abandoned the requirement and updated their statutes to add driving under the influence of any impairing drugs to their impaired driving law. Now New York is one of only 4 states relying on an unworkable list. The proposed Deadly Driving Bill’s definition of “drug” in the Vehicle and Traffic Law to include any substance or combination of substances that impair, to any extent, physical or mental abilities meets the NTSB recommendation. The bill also defines impairment and intoxication for the first-time using language supported by the New York Chapter of the American College of Physicians.

The bill does not expand law enforcement’s ability to make car stops nor does it create new crimes. It makes existing law workable. It does not roll back cannabis legalization. And it does not create a “per se” drugged driving charge that would be based only on the driver having a specific amount of a drug in the driver’s bloodstream. Current scientific research does not support a “per se” statute because drugs work differently than alcohol in the body. Blood levels do not correlate to impairment the same way. Instead, the revised law would continue to require a showing of “actual impairment” using the best training and scientific tools available, not just the presence of a substance. But when impairment from any substance can be seen, the driver must be prohibited from driving.

Safety Town. Photo from TOB

In participation of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s National Teen Driver Safety Week, the Brookhaven Highway Department will be offering a Teen Driver Safety Program at Safety Town in Holtsville on Thursday, Oct. 19, from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.

Teenagers 15 and older and their parents are invited to participate in an interactive experience exhibiting the dangers of texting or drinking and driving. During this intense, real-life program, certified instructors with many years of defensive driving and accident investigation experience will talk with participants about the importance of developing safe habits when traveling the roadways. Teens will then use electric cars to complete obstacle courses designed to simulate driving while texting and impaired. Pre-registration is required.

“Programs such as this are crucial in showing young, new drivers the tremendous threats drunken or distracted driving can create,” said Brookhaven Town Highway Superintendent Daniel P. Losquadro. “We want to make sure students understand that when they’re behind the wheel of a car, it is entirely within their control to prevent a tragic accident caused by driving while distracted or impaired.”

Located at the Holtsville Ecology Site, 249 Buckley Road in Holtsville,  Safety Town is a miniature village with an indoor and outdoor educational facility. Throughout the year, Safety Town hosts bicycle safety rodeos, car seat inspections, teen distracted driving programs, and defensive driving classes.

Call 631-451-5335 for more information or to register.

METRO photo

The last few days marked National School Bus Safety and National Teen Driver Safety weeks. The lessons and tips organizations shared during these respective periods are vital to remember all year.

School bus laws seem easy for drivers to understand when they are behind the easy-to-spot, yellow vehicle. However, confusion seems to ensue when it is situated elsewhere on the road. If a driver is in the vicinity of a school bus with its red lights flashing and its “stop” sign extended, it means to stop and wait. This applies not only when a driver is behind the school bus but also when it’s on the opposite side of the road, whether it be on a two-way street, divided highway or multiple-lane roadway. The rules also apply in parking lots and school grounds.

In New York, respecting the law can mean saving anywhere from $250 to $1,000 in fines, avoiding jail time, having points on a license or its being revoked. Most important of all, stopping when seeing a school bus saves children’s lives.

When those children grow up and are ready to learn how to drive, there is a lot to take in, and safe driving behaviors should be of the utmost importance. Parents need to have meaningful conversations with their children about making sure seat belts are used and traffic laws are followed.

The repercussions of distracted driving, such as loud music, goofing around with friends and checking text messages, must also be brought up. Parents can lead by example by ensuring when their teens are behind the wheel, they avoid bad driving habits, especially when other young people are in the car.

One of the most important conversations parents can have with their children is that if using alcohol or drugs at a party, make sure to have a designated driver, sleep over or use Uber or Lyft. While the use of these apps has increased, providing rides when needed, some still insist on getting behind the wheel after drinking. With the holidays around the corner, incidents of people too impaired to drive will inevitably increase. A car can always be retrieved from where it was left the night before, but a life can never be replaced.

With the cooler weather here, there is another traffic safety reminder for people of all ages to heed. It’s the beginning of mating season for deer, also known as rutting season. The animals can run out on the road without warning. Usually when a driver sees one, there may be another or a few right behind the first, especially around dusk. When one is spotted, proceed with caution — and respect deer-crossing warning signs.

Dangers on our roadways seem to be increasing every day, but with a little bit of education and care, we can make our roads safer for all.

The Town of Huntington hosted a MADD event July 28 to remind drivers of the '100 Deadliest Days.' Photo by Kimberly Brown

Mothers Against Drunk Driving representatives, Town of Huntington officials and Suffolk County Police Department members gathered at Greenlawn Park on Wednesday, July 28, to bring awareness and prevent the string of fatal collisions in the summer season known as the “100 Deadliest Days.”

The period between Memorial Day and Labor Day is known as the most dangerous time for Long Islanders as driving while intoxicated and distracted driving uptick dramatically. Over 7,000 people nationwide died in teen-related collisions from 2010-19 during this time period.

“It’s very simple,” said town Councilman Eugene Cook (R). “Do not drink and do not drive. Call somebody or make arrangements ahead of time. Understand that if you drink and drive, you are not only putting your own life but other lives at risk.”

Two of the members from MADD who joined the conference were Alisa and John McMorris, whose son Andrew was tragically struck by a drunk driver in 2018 while hiking alongside a road in Manorville with his Boy Scout group. Other Scouts were injured by the driver as well.

“Each headline we read, every story we hear, every parent’s eyes that we look into, knowing that there’s no amount of comfort that I can give them because this horrific nature stays with a parent forever,” Alisa McMorris said. “We saw it on the news and thought this happens to other families, but it’s going to happen to you.”

While holding a school portrait of Andrew, the McMorris family pleaded for Long Islanders to be upstanders if they see someone who is about to drink and drive.

One of the goals MADD is trying to put into action is starting federal legislation to stop tragedies such as Andrew’s from happening again.

“This is why our family and the Andrew McMorris Foundation along with MADD are fighting so hard to get drunk driving prevention technology on all new vehicles as soon as possible. Technology exists today that could stop this, and we need the [U.S.] Senate to pass Reduce Impaired Driving for Everyone [Act],​​” Alisa McMorris said.

For more information on MADD visit www.madd.org/new-york.

Legislator Sarah Anker and challenger Gary Pollakusky during a debate at the Sound Beach Firehouse. Photo by David Luces

County Legislator Sarah Anker (D-Mount Sinai) and Gary Pollakusky, the challenger, dueled at a meet the candidates night hosted by the Sound Beach Civic Association Oct. 14. Anker has served as the Suffolk County 6th District legislator for the past eight years and is seeking another two-year term. Pollakusky is looking to unseat the incumbent after an unsuccessful run for the same position in 2017. 

Here are some of the topics the candidates discussed. 

Suffolk’s fiscal situation

Pollakusky criticized how the county handles its finances. He said there have been seven bond downgrades since 2012 and the structural deficit is between $85 and $150 million. 

“We have raised taxes and fees by $200 million in the last eight years; we are not doing the right thing by our residents,” he said.  

Anker disagreed saying that the county has never had a junk bond status.

“We’ve never been there,” she said, adding the county has a AAA bond rating in long-term debt services.

“When I took office in 2011, there was a $500 million deficit, we changed that,” the legislator said. “We are anywhere near $50 to $60 million. We are cleaning up the house, we really are.”

The incumbent also said the county has since streamlined services, combined departments and reduced staff. 

Heroin/opioid epidemic  

Both candidates agreed that the opioid epidemic is still an ongoing problem on Long Island. 

Pollakusky said there are three ways to address the epidemic. He would look into finding prevention programs for schools whether they be assembly or curriculum based.  

The challenger touched on law enforcement. 

“Our law enforcement is so important to the process of fighting this opioid epidemic. We have hundreds of drug dealing homes along the North Shore,” he said. “These are consistent offenders, we don’t have enough boots on the ground, law enforcement is thinned staffed and that’s because our county is fiscally irresponsible.”

Pollakusky criticized Anker for voting to close the Foley center, a nursing and rehabilitation facility, saying treatment programs are few and far between. 

Anker defended her choice on the Foley center stating that it was losing $10 million a year, so the county executive thought it best to sell it. 

She spoke about her work as the chair of the Suffolk County Heroin and Opiate Epidemic Advisory Panel including beginning to institute Narcan workshops in the fight against opioids. 

“We are getting a lot done, we are cross communicating, networking, we are finding where the system is failing us,” she said. 

The incumbent brought up education as a key component.  

“We have to get to these kids when they are young, not to scare them, but to begin education in elementary and increase it into middle and high school,” she said.  

Red-light camera program/road safety

Anker said the red-light cameras are meant to protect residents and get drivers to stop and prevent accidents.  

She mentioned fatal accidents have decreased by 11 percent, but there was an increase in rear-end crashes that she considered unacceptable. She said she is frustrated with the program as it is not working as it should be. 

“The report I had commissioned failed to look into distracted driving,” she said. “I need to know if it’s a red light or [someone] being distracted. I’ve heard from law enforcement that its mostly distracted driving.” 

She also said there needs to be more educational driving programs for teens and adults. 

Pollakusky said if elected he would terminate the red-light program. 

“It has been a money grab for our county for some time, and they have just voted to extend this for another five years,” he said. 

The challenger called out Anker for commissioning another report on the program that cost taxpayers $250,000. 

He stated the report shows that accidents increased at intersections with red-light cameras and argued that yellow lights change quicker to red merely for profit.  

Development/infrastructure/housing

Anker said she would focus on creating a type of smart growth development where housing is built in one area so work can be done on the surrounding infrastructure.

She likened it to the Ronkonkoma hub development. The incumbent also proposed creating an eco-tourism hub located on the north end of the William Floyd Parkway, which would  support local businesses.  

“Tourism dollars have brought in $4 billion to Long Island,” she said. 

For housing, Anker would propose creating a millennial housing project similar to planned retirement communities that would be located near college campuses and transportation. She also mentioned the ongoing revitalization of downtown Rocky Point. 

Pollakusky said he is less concerned with development, as they are seeing seniors and college graduates leave the area and more empty business fronts in the area. 

“The problem is people are leaving because of taxes,” he said. “Expand the tax base, lower the residential tax burden by supporting businesses.”

The challenger said local businesses are important to the fabric of the community.   

“We need to inspire commerce and economic development,” he said.  

Red light cameras along Route 25A. File photo by Elana Glowatz
Since 2010, Suffolk County has been authorized by New York State to install red-light cameras at intersections. Today, 215 cameras operate at 100 intersections. The program is intended to reduce the number of cars running red traffic lights and by extension reduce the number of crashes and the severity of the crashes. The county has as its vendor for the red-light camera program Conduent, a divestiture from Xerox. Conduent receives from Suffolk County 42 percent of all fines as per contract terms, and its contract was set to expire December 2019. Graphic by TBR News Media

The next five years of red-light cameras’ survival in Suffolk County has finally been decided.

After lengthy debate and public comment period, Suffolk lawmakers voted along party lines to extend the program for another five years Sept. 4. The program was set to expire by the end of the year.

Legislators speak out on the red light camera program. Photo by David Luces

The issue of red-light cameras has been a divisive topic since its inception nearly a decade ago. Republicans, who unanimously opposed the program, have called it a ‘money grab’ for the county, which has generated $20 million in revenue annually. Democrats, on the other hand, supported the extension though acknowledged that it needs to be fixed.

Legislator Sarah Anker (D-Mount Sinai), who co-sponsored a bill for a report on the county’s red-light camera program, said she remained frustrated with its findings but ultimately supported the program. She also called for more education on distracted driving prevention.

“There needs to be improvements [to the program], the program right now is not acceptable,” she said.

Legislators proposed the idea of payment plans for fines, waiving administrative fees for first-time offenders and the implementation of an annual report on all camera locations.

Republicans said the program has negatively affected driver behavior, as many drivers stop short at red lights to avoid getting a ticket. The county has seen a marked increase in rear-end accidents in the last few years.

Paul Margiotta, executive director of the Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, disagreed and pointed to the increased prevalence of distracted driving as the culprit. He said he believed the program has been working.

Republicans continue to disagree.

“It has become clear that the program isn’t working said Comptroller John Kennedy, who is running for county executive in the fall against Steve Bellone (D). “Suffolk’s residents realize it’s little more than a money grab,”

Supporters have said the program has saved lives by reducing red-light running and serious accidents on roadways.

“The minority caucus led by Rob Trotta and his band of conspiracy theorists were dealt a resounding defeat. This is a victory for common sense and effective public safety programs,” said Jason Elan, a Bellone spokesperson, in a statement.

Though before the vote, many of those who attended the Sept 4. meeting spoke negatively about the program.

“Red light cameras are disproportionately located in lower income neighborhoods.”

— Hector Gavilla

Hector Gavilla, a Huntington-based lawyer who is running for county legislature, said Suffolk is trying to come up with reasons to say the program works.

“Red light cameras are disproportionately located in lower income neighborhoods,” he said. “This red-light camera tax is placed on the most vulnerable people in our communities… we all agree that whoever intentionally tries to run a red-light should definitely get a ticket, however the vast majority of these tickets are on right turns on red.”

Previously, legislators proposed relocating red-light cameras to areas and intersections where the most serious accidents occur.

Other speakers said the program is failing in its original goal to improve public safety.

As one individual put it: “If it’s [red-light cameras] causing more accidents than it’s not safe,”

Another concerned county resident said it is a no-brainer to not extend the program.

“You can’t delay this to another five years, fix the flaws of this program, fix the quality of life in Suffolk County,” he said.

Legislators have already put in a request for proposal to find a new vendor for the program. They stressed the need for the new vendor to be either locally based or be required to have an office in the county. Also, Margiotta said county officials plan to look for a vendor that provides a payment plan.

Public Works Committee to vote on extending the program Aug. 29

Suffolk County's Public Works Committee will vote Aug. 29 to decide the future of red-light camera program. TBR News Media file photo

The future of red-light cameras in Suffolk County remains up in the air. 

Legislators took issue with a report on the county’s red-light camera program in a meeting Aug. 26. It left some with more questions than answers regarding the divisive program as they prepare for a vote that could extend the program’s lifespan this Thursday, Aug. 29.

The countywide report carried out by Brookhaven-based L.K. McLean Associates found that the number of total crashes at 100 intersections with red-light cameras increased by nearly 60 percent from 2015 through 2017, compared to the time period (2007-09) before the cameras were installed beginning in 2010. The study found that at red-light intersections the number of crashes exceeded projections by 42 percent in total. 

Also, it found that a total of 17 fatal crashes occurred at red-light intersections for the duration of the report. Crashes that resulted in injuries decreased by nearly 11 percent, while the number of rear-end crashes increased by 46 percent. 

Officials from the consulting firm presented the report, which cost the county $250,000, to the county Legislature’s Public Works Committee Aug. 26 and disclosed they estimated the red-light program had generated more than $5 million in savings by reducing serious accidents. 

Despite those findings, legislators on the committee took issue with the results and said it left them with more questions than answers. 

One criticism levied was the way the consultants collected their data and how they determined if an accident was linked to an intersection with a red-light camera.

Raymond DiBiase, president and chief executive of L.K. McLean Associates, said they based their parameters from the New York State Department of Transportation. 

“The DOT in their crash data analysis and summaries identify an intersection crash as one that occurs within 10 meters or 33 feet from the center of the intersection,” he said. 

The consultants for the report expanded the crash area to within 200 feet of the center of the intersection, but some legislators questioned that decision and argued it could have captured crashes that fall in line with the definition of an intersection crash.

Legislator Sarah Anker (D-Mount Sinai) said she was deeply disappointed in the report’s findings and criticized the firm with not looking at the link between distracted driving and crashes at red-light intersections. 

“What has not been mentioned at all during your report is distracted driving,” she said. “I have a traffic safety issue in my district; I have two of the most dangerous roads on Long Island —[routes] 25 and 25A.”

DiBiase responded by saying it is difficult to prove what exactly caused a crash from the data. Their goal was to make the study objective as possible and said distracted driving falls in a gray area as it is difficult to prove due to factors like lack of witnesses or evidence. 

“Distracted driving is why a lot of these accidents are happening,” Anker said. “We are here to try and understand how to make this program better. We know it’s saving lives, but we also know it’s also creating problems.”

The red-light program has generated more than $20 million in revenue annually for the county.

Legislator Robert Trotta (R-Fort Salonga), who has long been a severe critic of red-light cameras, said the program is a money grab and a tax on the taxpayers. He also criticized the consultants for only mentioning that fatal accidents at red-light camera intersections were lower than projected, and not also including data on fatal crashes that occurred at intersections without red-light cameras. 

“You can take these reports and throw them in the garbage can, it’s a joke — literally embarrassing,” Trotta said. “Everything here is jaded to make this program look good, it is a $32 million sham on the people of this county.”

Despite the lukewarm response to its report, the firm recommended continuing the red-light program, pointing to a decrease in crashes resulting in injuries and fatalities as well as a reduction in left-turn crashes.

The Public Works Committee is expected to vote Thursday, Aug. 29, on whether it will extend the countywide red-light camera program for another five years. If it were to pass it will go to the Legislature for a vote that could take place as soon as next Wednesday, Sept. 4.