Read more

July 14, 2020
2 min read
Save

SAPHO syndrome 'remains an enigma' for rheumatologists

You've successfully added to your alerts. You will receive an email when new content is published.

Click Here to Manage Email Alerts

We were unable to process your request. Please try again later. If you continue to have this issue please contact customerservice@slackinc.com.

Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteomyelitis — collectively known as SAPHO syndrome — in pustular psoriasis remains for most rheumatologists a rare enigma with an unclear pathogenesis, according to Philip Helliwell, PhD, DM, BM BCh, FRCP, MA, of the University of Leeds.

“SAPHO syndrome remains an enigma and is, for most rheumatologists, a rare syndrome that is perhaps more common in certain areas, such as Japan and North Africa,” Helliwell told attendees at a GRAPPA 2020 Annual Meeting webcast. “Treatment of the syndrome, as is usual for an orphan condition where pathogenesis is unclear and there aren’t enough people for random clinical trials, is still fairly empirical.”

SAPHO syndrome is a rare condition that remains an enigma for rheumatologists, according to Helliwell. Source: Adobe Stock

According to Helliwell, diagnostic criteria for SAPHO, proposed in 1994 by French rheumatologist Marcel-Francis Kahn, include any of the following characteristics:

  • Chronic, recurrent, multifocal sterile and axial osteomyelitis, with or without dermatosis;
  • Acute, subacute or chronic arthritis associated with palmoplantar pustulosis, pustulous psoriasis or severe acne; or
  • Any sterile osteitis associated with palmoplantar pustulosis, pustulous psoriasis or severe acne.

However, in a recently published survey of 78 members of GRAPPA and various rheumatology societies in Japan and Israel, just 59% of respondents stated these criteria reflected SAPHO cases in their practice, and 84.6% expressed the need for an update.

In addition, there were varying opinions regarding where the syndrome belongs, with 48.7% viewing it as a subtype of spondyloarthritis, 19.2% categorizing it as a subtype of psoriatic arthritis and 6.4% seeing it as a type of reactive arthritis. Just 25.6% of respondents classified the disease as its own entity, Helliwell said.

Treatment of SAPHO syndrome was also varied, with most respondents reporting the use of NSAIDs and anti-TNF biologic therapy, followed by conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, bisphosphonates and glucocorticoids, he added.

“There is also limited use of other biological therapy, or antibiotics, tonsillectomy in a few cases, isotretinoin, topical therapy and, in some cases, intra-articular steroid injection,” Helliwell said.

Looking forward, Helliwell suggested it may be time to start exploring the possibility of developing new criteria for the condition, as well as looking more closely at PsA, ankylosing spondyloarthritis and pustular-psoriasis genetics within this group of patients.

“I think it would be worth looking at developing new criteria,” he said. “As well as have a better look at the genetics and see how they relate to spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis and the new genetics of generalized pustular psoriasis.”